In Defense of Mary, Mother of Jesus of Nazareth
1. The Alleged Revelation, the Test of a Prophet, and the Failure of Judgment
The text of Surah 19:28 and Surah 66:12 presents itself as a divine revelation delivered by an angel. However, by stating that Mary, the mother of Jesus, is the "sister of Aaron" (Ukht Hārūn) and the "daughter of Amram" (Maryam bint 'Imrān), the text introduces a direct chronological and genealogical confusion of 1,500 years between two completely distinct women.
A man who presents himself as a prophet cannot exempt himself from the responsibility of logical reasoning. If Muhammad were standing before an authentic angel and a legitimate revelation, any conscious and responsible mind would have questioned the message upon perceiving such a glaring discrepancy with well-known historical facts. It would have sufficed to consult the "People of the Book" (Jews and Christians), whom the Quranic text itself references at other times. However, Christians—who were later persecuted and labeled as "polytheists" (shirk) for confessing faith in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—had already preserved the genealogy and history of Mary with biblical and documentary accuracy for centuries.
A prophet, as a human being (such as Moses, Elijah, or Jeremiah), may make mistakes in his daily personal conduct. However, in the word, in the logo/verb, and in the prophecy spoken in the name of God, there can be no factual error. By biblical standard (Deuteronomy 18:22), if the word spoken in the name of the Lord contains a factual error, it does not come from God, making the preacher a false prophet. As the Quran itself establishes in Surah 69:44–46—stating that if the prophet invented falsehoods about God, He would have "severed his aorta (al-watīn)"—historical records (Sahih al-Bukhari 4428) note that Muhammad declared on his deathbed due to poisoning that he felt his aorta being severed, fulfilling in the physical realm the very sentence declared against false prophecies.
2. Who Mary, Mother of Jesus, Really Is
To understand the truth without ambiguity, one must look at the identity, lineage, and spiritual stature of Mary of Nazareth:
* Tribe and Lineage: Mary belonged to the tribe of Judah and to the royal lineage of King David (Luke 1:32; Luke 3:23–31; Romans 1:3). This lineage was an indispensable prophetic and messianic requirement for the birth of the Christ.
* Era: She lived in the 1st century AD.
* Maturity and Character: God would not send a prophetic message of such immense responsibility to a child or to a person lacking discernment. Mary’s song (Magnificat – Luke 1:46–55) reveals a young woman—between 16 and 20 years old—with deep theological background, spiritual vision, historical awareness, and strength of character. She knew the Scriptures, understood the reach of the promise, and responded with full moral consciousness and faith.
3. Who Miriam, Sister of Aaron and Moses, Is
Miriam is a distinct figure, with her place and purpose clearly defined in the Old Testament:
* Tribe and Lineage: Miriam was the daughter of Amram, belonging to the priestly tribe of Levi (Exodus 15:20; Numbers 26:59).
* Era: She lived in the 15th century BC, during the Exodus from Egypt.
* Historical Role: She was the prophetess who led the song of victory after the crossing of the Red Sea, living approximately 1,500 years before the birth of Jesus Christ.
4. Factual Conclusion
This exposition does not seek personal attack or verbal aggression, but rather transparency, honesty, and the construction of coherent reasoning grounded in the facts of history.
Mary (of the tribe of Judah, mother of Jesus, 1st century AD) and Miriam (of the tribe of Levi, sister of Aaron, 15th century BC) are two women with completely separate histories, tribes, and eras. An angel from the presence of God would never make genealogical errors, and divine prophetic speech does not accept factual error in the word. The story of Mary of Nazareth stands firm, exact, and honored in the fullness of time.
Miguel Westerberg
October 13, 2026
Comentários